When AI takes all jobs how will the lowest class make money to survive?

This goes for any desire. Rather than having our desires artificially restricted by money, this economy can cater to our natural demand and adapt to our increasing demands as we become more and more satisfied.

A resource-based economy would use advanced AI to allocate resources vastly more efficiently than the capitalist system we have today. It is worth emphasising this point as many believe that money and markets have a special unassailable advantage when it comes to this task, but they are mistaken. Money results in enormous waste of resources: roughly a third of all food produced is wasted because it is not “profitable” to harvest it, and what supermarkets can't sell they dispose of in locked bins to protect themselves against litigation from people eating the potentially spoiled produce, and to disincentivise not buying said produce. We send enormous amounts of waste that could be recycled to landfills because it is not “profitable” to sort it out so it can be recycled. The system inevitably corrupts the political system to create subsidies and special treatment for its most successful companies so that they can continue to accrue more resources and undermine the very mechanisms that are meant to make the market efficient.

Let's say you have an autistic child that loves a particular burger from their local cafe. They get this on a regular basis until one day the cafe shuts down and, despite everyone's best efforts to recreate that exact burger, no-one can do so, and the child becomes very upset. The AI economy would be able to serve this child indefinitely: not only would it keep a record of the exact ingredients and method of preparation of the burger so that even if the cafe that made it did close down, another robot would be able to make it flawlessly, or the child would have their own robot chef that could take any food made outside their house and reproduce the recipe exactly. Even if the child didn't have their own robot, which under this economy could only happen by the parents’ choice, their preferences could be stored in an AI system so that some kitchen somewhere in the economy could make it and deliver it to them.

How does a man look at you when he is in love?

This is simply a better system. No-one gets left behind because of the circumstances of their birth, and there are no perverse incentives corrupting the system. Everything is always and forever designed to serve human wellbeing. It is imperative we fight for this vision of the future instead of being cajoled or gaslit into accepting a UBI which artificially restricts our access to these abundant resources so that AI execs and shareholders can take it all for themselves. If we get this right, we can permanently end poverty and world hunger.

You might retort that the fact that food isn't harvested and waste isn't recycled because it's not profitable is economic efficiency in action, because it means we don't have the resources to collect them. This is patently ridiculous: we have no shortage of people who are unemployed and would love to be able to do this work but can't because it will not financially sustain them. The key point is the corruption that is inevitable under this system: it necessarily ruins the ideologically pure version of itself advocated by hard-core capitalists and undermines the benefits it claims to have.

AI will turn labour from a scarce resource that must be trained over several decades into a commodity that can be produced and scaled up at will. Once we achieve AGI, anyone can have their own robot butler, chef, therapist, doctor, interior designer, personal trainer, and teacher all in one. It will be trivial for a robot economy to make billions of these. Since no-one will be earning money, there would be no logic to arbitrarily denying anyone access to these via a monetary mechanism, and it would be profoundly immoral to do so when such unfathomable abundance is possible.

Patriots OTAs takeaways: Drake Maye rises, Stefon Diggs returns, rookie WR shines - Boston Herald

If we do things right, we can have a resource-based economy that doesn't use money where people are provided their wants and needs freely and unconditionally.

AI will take all jobs and what few tasks we might prefer to be done by humans will not be enough to sustain a monetary economy. Rather than argue for UBI, I will in this answer be arguing for a resource-based economy.

An AI-led resource-based economy will suffer from none of these drawbacks. First, AI will be able to use its wealth of data and intelligence to anticipate demand and ship exactly the right type and quantity of products to where they are most needed. It will never leave food in the field, stock on the shelves, or recyclable waste in landfills, because it will have abundant labour and energy to collect it, and ample intelligence to develop new and more efficient methods for doing so. The system will primarily cater to our needs, and we will all have the same economic relations to the system, so unless the AI is misaligned or corrupt from the beginning, it will not reproduce the same corruption present in our current system.

Hi everybody! I have been looking at posts on narcs and narc abuse on here and if has really helped me out a lot. I am currently struggling with my situation and need some advice/support. I met a narc last year, everything seemed to good to be true. Love bombing, always texting calling and taking me on dates. Everything changed when someone warned me about him out in public in front of him and who he is. This caused a conflict with us and the love bombing seized. he would tell me that everything is okay and i can come and talk. He would set a time limit on me and kick me out after that. he would then text me like everything was fine and we hung out again and after that he completely ghosted me for one week. He came back and texted me a week later laughing about the ghosting and acting like nothing had happened. he continued to text me ( not like in the beginning) make plans with me, then on the day of the plans he would just ghost me. One day he would act interested the next silence. i contacted him a month later and he acted like nothing happened. He was on a vacation and sent me a picture of another woman ( someone he allegedly met on the trip) to strike a reaction but i never gave him one. After the trip he came to my place and was extremely rude, accusing me of going on dates with a bunch of men. The next day he accused me of being an alcoholic and that he wanted nothing to do with me but said well maybe we can be "friends" then ghosted me i assumed at this point it was over and i would never hear from him again. He contacted me on the holiday a month later acting like everything was great. We ended up hanging out a month or so later and when we hung out it went well, i thought things were going in the right direction. after we hung out.. silence. I would try to text him and if he replied it would be very short then he just stopped replying. He ghosted me for almost three months. I thought he was done this time and of course he popped up again like nothing happened. At this point i was getting sick of if so i questioned him as to why he dissapeared and always does this. Of course he had some sob story about a injury and family member dying of cancer. I felt pity for him and he gave me an apology.. so i took him back stupidly. things seemed to be going smooth for a couple months, of course until his family member died and his injury got better he never contacted me and was distant. Menawhile, i was there for him during the difficult time for him. He lied to me about the funeral and never wanted to chat. I was chasing him and he would always claim nothing was wrong but when i said i thought he used me when he was down he could not handle it and would always tell me he didnt care and to go away. I would get so upset i would try texting him to work it out he would barelt respond and if he did he would not be nice about it. we did hang out a couple times after that, he would ignore me after. One day i was like hey i think you are seeing someone else, and i was like well ixam seeing someone so no problem if you are he said " buy bye good luck with your new guy stop contacting me" i was devastated and tried to get into contact with him for weeks then i just gave up and accepted it was over. He ended up contacting me a month later acting like everything was fine. He wanted to go out and have drinks i told him i would. He and i both seemed to have a great time. He ends up ignoring me again. I kept texting him trying to figure out what was wrong. He kept saying everything was fine and i said ok can we hang out again? He said maybe i was like why? He just kept saying maybe … our last conversation we had… i said what is wrong ? He said nothing is wrong everything is fine. I asked him why he keeps saying maybe. He said " maybe but i dont want to see you right now" i said why? He saix " im just not feeling it, if i wanted to date i would" i said why did you contact me less then a week ago wanting to go out? He said i didnt.. even though he did. So i said should i just move on or what? He said whatever you want to do. So i said that he was really confusing me and asked him if he had anything more to say before i move on? My messages were turning green so i panicked he blocked me and reacted irrationally. I said " omg did you block me? My messages are not going through. Even texted him on my work phone asking what was up. And called him twice ( please dont judge me i know it is pathetic i never was this type of girl before him) so he replied and said " Ok I'll block you now" then immedietly blocked me. He has never blocked me before since I have met him he will just ghost. Is this ths final discard aka " grand finale? Did i just push him too far? this has upset me so much its hard to even function.

Nevertheless, economic efficiency will not be the most important metric in this economy, serving people will. Efficiency will be important to a degree, as it is important that there is enough of everything to go around, but this system will be able to cater to edge cases that would be unacceptable under capitalism.